| 
Celebrities Before And After Photoshop
|
An interesting look at celebrities photos before and after photoshop. These are mostly used in magazines, posters and given the photoshop treatment from their original source. 26 more pics after the jump. Source: Ellf.ru |
Related Posts
January 2nd, 2009 at 9:58 pm
[...] you want to see some evidence, check out this gallery of celebrity photos before and after editing. In that particular set I see a lot of breast-lifting and face slimming in [...]
January 6th, 2009 at 7:58 am
The last girl at the bottom looks beautiful how she is. There was no need at all to cover the freckles. No wonder young girls have so many body issues. People just do not look like that!
January 25th, 2009 at 10:07 pm
I’m surprised that a lot of people are only picking up the facial re-touching and ignoring the tummy tucks, boob enhancements, disappearing hips and stretch marks.
January 27th, 2009 at 1:25 am
Does anyone else think they tend to go overboard? Sometimes seeing a really gorgeous model wear something (and look incredible) actually makes me not want to get it for fear of looking rubbish compared. Also the last girl looks like an alien when she’s been touched up whereas before she looks cute. Fashion magazines really need to tone it down. I like pretty I don’t like perfect
January 31st, 2009 at 3:51 am
Is sO cool…i have photoshop..but i don’t knew so better to use it…:))…but is really super!
February 4th, 2009 at 10:52 am
Yea, Its good to know that I’m not the only one who thinks the last picture looks waaaay better untouched. I only started reading the comments because I was wondering if I was alone on that. Guess not. Someone should forward these to her.
February 14th, 2009 at 12:54 am
[...] Se billederne hos http://www.ellf.ru eller hos hemmy.net [...]
February 15th, 2009 at 7:15 am
wow they really did a number on brittany murphy’s pic! the “after” is muuuch better.
February 27th, 2009 at 9:36 pm
I thing the people of showbissnes is so “plastic” you understand what i want to say…my english is not so good because i’m greek…well..i mean that all the models,all the singers,all the actress and actors are “plastics” because they only want to seem beutifull and young…on the other hand i believe that all of them are famous and they don’t want to see them angly…well…i am sarah and i have just finished…
March 13th, 2009 at 6:30 am
[...] http://www.hemmy.net/2007/05/25/celebrities-before-and-after-photoshop/ [...]
April 10th, 2009 at 6:03 am
I feel hot as hell after seeing this…WOW!
April 15th, 2009 at 9:19 pm
oh my gosh…i can’t believe.now i feel stupid,i wanted to be one of those stars but i guess i’m better than them.thnx a lot!!!!!
April 27th, 2009 at 2:44 am
they create a pictureperfect wich all the people seem to believe.
this is why girls (and boys) like you and I still have problems with their selfesteem.
most of that people already are naturel beauty’s but no;
they photoshop the hell out of them!
See, I learned not to care about what people think or say,
I guess that’s pretty much the only way to survive in this crazy world.
May 12th, 2009 at 2:50 am
I like the real ones there face looks more shiner then the photoshopped ones they suck lolz
June 2nd, 2009 at 7:29 am
I agree that the last 2 photos…the before is much better very pretty!!!
June 3rd, 2009 at 10:53 pm
Why are they hiding themselves?
Some of them look better before!
June 22nd, 2009 at 2:04 am
OMG, photoshop did a great job for those celebrities, and I can see now that they also had acne and stuff like that
I like the way Penelope Cruz looks and also Naomi Watts, they are hot in real life
July 3rd, 2009 at 2:05 am
Yeah, there are a handful out there that do look photoshopped when they’re not though.
July 3rd, 2009 at 6:48 am
I cannot belice some of these photos. Sure, I can understand some, but others….UG!
July 30th, 2009 at 10:48 am
The second Beyonce photo was also photoshopped (it appeared in a magazine), it’s just the first photo of Beyonce was an online photoshopping of a photo that was already photoshopped for a magazine, she doesn’t look like that
July 31st, 2009 at 8:07 am
of the two last photos i prefer the last one… natural beauty…
August 1st, 2009 at 10:53 pm
THERES NO NEED TO PHOTOSHOP.
stop photoshopping and put makeup on insetad. you do not need photoshoping..
August 17th, 2009 at 5:09 am
The very last photos present Polish performer Anna Maria Jopek. But I’m not 100% sure…If I’m correct she’s over 40 years old.
August 17th, 2009 at 1:43 pm
This makes my job as a working actress who hasn’t “made” it yet THAT much harder. The casting directors themselves forget that these photos were photoshoped, and except real people to meet these unbelievable standards, so how are real people ever supposed to get hired?
August 29th, 2009 at 10:34 am
WOW. just WOW.
I agree with what pretty much everyone has said.
When people (especially kids, who are hurt so much by this) see all of this, they believe that this is the norm and then try to duplicate those looks on their bodies and faces. It’s really freaky to see how different it all looks once you take a look at the before and after photos.
I saw a couple of you say, “I feel a lot prettier now!” I know what you mean! When people see those pictures, even if you make a vow not to let it bother you, it’s a subconscious impact that takes place in our brains. I really think that everyone should be reminded of this photoshopping thing from time to time, because I’ve seem this damage so many lives and waste so much time.
My take on it
September 1st, 2009 at 9:47 pm
Photoshop is such an amazing piece of software, and people who retouch photos in the way which was demostrated on this page are artists - I truly believe that. Anyone who has anything negative to say about Photoshop, or it’s use in media publications, is clearly insecure with themselves.
September 7th, 2009 at 11:15 pm
I think that most of them there didnt really need the extra touch up because not everyone is perfect so why should they be edited to fit some stuck up womans opinion or how they dress. Just because you dont look like them doesnt mean your not hot, pretty or glamorous. Thats just a stereotype when someone says there pretty, they meen someone they have seen in a magazine that might of well just worn loads of industrial foundation and tons of lip gloss. Also editing them makes others feel bad on how they look and they go to lengthy extremes just to slightly look like them when perfection like that is unreal.
September 29th, 2009 at 12:40 pm
I also agree the last one is better in it’s original
September 30th, 2009 at 9:19 pm
Why, why for the love of god did they remove freckles in the last one? I like the original.
October 6th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
the people who get touched up look unnatural, they look fake - it does not appeal to me, and like others have said people who are touched up in magazines make people who hav flaws feel worse about themselves and envy that particular celebs skin/face/body, etc.
its not real, and i think celebs need to wake up.
even tho some photoshop pics look good, however it is a big fat lie
October 15th, 2009 at 6:57 am
many of he images where just poor photography in the first place, a good number of them where under exposed which would cause a lack of contrast. Every image had a heavy contrast bump.
Lighting is key know what to lights/modifiers to use to get a look/feel is important, too many time on a shoot you will here just fix in PS, PS is evil!!!!
Get it right in the camera!
October 16th, 2009 at 9:52 am
Well you’re sort of right Dave. It’s scary, yeah…. but it’s not in the slightest bit cool. I suppose it’s now too late for most developed societies to undo, but we have all been taught that us regular joes are just disgusting skin bags, and that we ought to hide ourselves away for not looking like people on magazine covers.
I think these pics are really good - for showing that even all those supposedly aesthetically perfect people sprawled across the latest style mags have EXACTLY the same gripes with their skin, complexion, and body fat that the rest of us do. I’m not sure why the photoshopping is really necessary as all them girls look pretty nice anyway.
October 24th, 2009 at 4:20 pm
i don’t bu magazines because the people in them look so lifeless and dull but if there were natural photos like the before pictures shown I would totally like to look at photos of celebs again. All the before pics had life and character. pores,warts and all is so neat
October 27th, 2009 at 6:06 am
OMG!!!that computer saved most of those ppls lives because they all werent so perfect!!!l0lz
D!sMiSs3d
November 14th, 2009 at 10:05 am
No real mention of the only guy, Matthew MacFaydden, in all these comments? He is a great actor and extremely handsome to me, but I can certainly understand a promo advert for a new play or telly show he is in to use the photo-shopped picture to remove the spots. It’s what folks expect. If you’re promoting a sleek new BBC drama you want the actors to appear larger/better than reality!
Besides, in his before picture he looks as though he hasn’t slept (or just woke up.) I still think he’s sexy in it because it’s natural.