<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Workplace Safety And Insurance Board PSA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hemmy.net/2007/12/07/workplace-safety-and-insurance-board-psa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hemmy.net/2007/12/07/workplace-safety-and-insurance-board-psa/</link>
	<description>Hemmy.net - A source of varied interests for everyone, the weblog that never sleeps.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:08:11 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toronto life insurance</title>
		<link>http://www.hemmy.net/2007/12/07/workplace-safety-and-insurance-board-psa/comment-page-1/#comment-207797</link>
		<dc:creator>Toronto life insurance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hemmy.net/2007/12/07/workplace-safety-and-insurance-board-psa/#comment-207797</guid>
		<description>Wow, now that is what I call &quot;shocking&quot;. But I guess there is no other way to persuade Canadians to  think about insurance. Although -as reading some of the other comments- it is a bit exaggerated. Such accidents may happen once in 10 years but it is definitely not an everyday accident  that people might experience. So I think that the idea of making a short video is good but I suggest you do it in a funny way, for instance by making a cartoon. I also think a lot about advertising because I have my own &lt;a href=&quot;â€http://lsminsurance.caâ€&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Toronto life insurance&lt;/a&gt; company. Unfortunately a lot of people only realize the importance of their safety when it&#039;s too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, now that is what I call &#8220;shocking&#8221;. But I guess there is no other way to persuade Canadians to  think about insurance. Although -as reading some of the other comments- it is a bit exaggerated. Such accidents may happen once in 10 years but it is definitely not an everyday accident  that people might experience. So I think that the idea of making a short video is good but I suggest you do it in a funny way, for instance by making a cartoon. I also think a lot about advertising because I have my own <a href="â€http://lsminsurance.caâ€" rel="nofollow">Toronto life insurance</a> company. Unfortunately a lot of people only realize the importance of their safety when it&#8217;s too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puckerpower</title>
		<link>http://www.hemmy.net/2007/12/07/workplace-safety-and-insurance-board-psa/comment-page-1/#comment-207443</link>
		<dc:creator>puckerpower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hemmy.net/2007/12/07/workplace-safety-and-insurance-board-psa/#comment-207443</guid>
		<description>This is an elaborate social marketing campaign orchestrated to manipulate the public into talking about accidents, safety and prevention rather than talking about the failure of workers compensation boards to compensate the victims. WCBs in each Canadian province (and in the US) have come under a lot of scrutiny for their avoidance of paying fair compensation to disabled workers. The fact that people are talking about the ads rather than the dysfunctionality of the WCB system shows that this orchestrated social manipulation campaign is working. 

WCBs in Canada and the US represent employers (the only ones paying into the fund). Therefore WCBs will do whatever they can to lower fees for corporations. One way is by denying compensation payments to disabled workers. But this would be socially unacceptable unless the public can also be manipulated into believing that the worker is somehow negligent or at fault for causing the accident. In this social marketing campaign, WCBs are subtly adopting the language of  the anti-drunk-driver campaign  - &quot; zero tolerance&quot; &quot;negligence&quot;, etc. to manipulate public attitudes towards injured workers. They also use the term &quot;accidents&quot; rather than &quot;injuries&quot; to take the focus away from the person and onto the event. These ads, and other orchestrated &#039;social engineering&#039; techniques lay the foundation for WCBs to justify a reduction in injury compensation payments to disabled workers by manipulating public attitudes toward disabled workers.

Those injured workers in the videos would realistically spend the rest of their lives in poverty fighting the WCB for compensation.  

The way to reduce injuries is to make companies accountable for workplace safety violations through realistic fees, not protect unsafe companies from these higher fees by denying disabled workers&#039; claims. 

If you think the WSIB&#039;s ads are scary, check out the Canadian Injured Workers Society at http://www.ciws.ca for a real eye-opener!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an elaborate social marketing campaign orchestrated to manipulate the public into talking about accidents, safety and prevention rather than talking about the failure of workers compensation boards to compensate the victims. WCBs in each Canadian province (and in the US) have come under a lot of scrutiny for their avoidance of paying fair compensation to disabled workers. The fact that people are talking about the ads rather than the dysfunctionality of the WCB system shows that this orchestrated social manipulation campaign is working. </p>
<p>WCBs in Canada and the US represent employers (the only ones paying into the fund). Therefore WCBs will do whatever they can to lower fees for corporations. One way is by denying compensation payments to disabled workers. But this would be socially unacceptable unless the public can also be manipulated into believing that the worker is somehow negligent or at fault for causing the accident. In this social marketing campaign, WCBs are subtly adopting the language of  the anti-drunk-driver campaign  &#8211; &#8221; zero tolerance&#8221; &#8220;negligence&#8221;, etc. to manipulate public attitudes towards injured workers. They also use the term &#8220;accidents&#8221; rather than &#8220;injuries&#8221; to take the focus away from the person and onto the event. These ads, and other orchestrated &#8216;social engineering&#8217; techniques lay the foundation for WCBs to justify a reduction in injury compensation payments to disabled workers by manipulating public attitudes toward disabled workers.</p>
<p>Those injured workers in the videos would realistically spend the rest of their lives in poverty fighting the WCB for compensation.  </p>
<p>The way to reduce injuries is to make companies accountable for workplace safety violations through realistic fees, not protect unsafe companies from these higher fees by denying disabled workers&#8217; claims. </p>
<p>If you think the WSIB&#8217;s ads are scary, check out the Canadian Injured Workers Society at <a href="http://www.ciws.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.ciws.ca</a> for a real eye-opener!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puckerpower</title>
		<link>http://www.hemmy.net/2007/12/07/workplace-safety-and-insurance-board-psa/comment-page-1/#comment-207442</link>
		<dc:creator>puckerpower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hemmy.net/2007/12/07/workplace-safety-and-insurance-board-psa/#comment-207442</guid>
		<description>No one would argue that workplace safety is not important. However, these gory ads are an elaborate social marketing campaign orchestrated to manipulate the public into talking about accidents, safety and prevention rather than talking about the failure of workers compensation boards to compensate the victims. WCBs in each Canadian province (and in the US) have come under a lot of scrutiny for their avoidance of paying fair compensation to disabled workers. The fact that people are talking about the ads rather than the dysfunctionality of the WCB system shows that this orchestrated social manipulation campaign is working. 

WCBs in Canada and the US represent employers (the only ones paying into the fund). Therefore WCBs will do whatever they can to lower fees for corporations. One way is by denying compensation payments to disabled workers. But this would be socially unacceptable unless the public can also be manipulated into believing that the worker is somehow negligent or at fault for causing the accident. In this social marketing campaign, WCBs are subtly adopting the language of  the anti-drunk-driver campaign  - &quot; zero tolerance&quot; &quot;negligence&quot;, etc. to manipulate public attitudes towards injured workers. They also use the term &quot;accidents&quot; rather than &quot;injuries&quot; to take the focus away from the person and onto the event. These ads, and other orchestrated &#039;social engineering&#039; techniques lay the foundation for WCBs to justify a reduction in injury compensation payments to disabled workers by manipulating public attitudes toward disabled workers.

Those injured workers in the videos would realistically spend the rest of their lives in poverty fighting the WCB for compensation.  

The way to reduce injuries is to make companies accountable for workplace safety violations through realistic fees, not protect unsafe companies from these higher fees by denying disabled workers&#039; claims. 

If you think the WSIB&#039;s ads are scary, check out the Canadian Injured Workers Society at http://www.ciws.ca for a real eye-opener!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one would argue that workplace safety is not important. However, these gory ads are an elaborate social marketing campaign orchestrated to manipulate the public into talking about accidents, safety and prevention rather than talking about the failure of workers compensation boards to compensate the victims. WCBs in each Canadian province (and in the US) have come under a lot of scrutiny for their avoidance of paying fair compensation to disabled workers. The fact that people are talking about the ads rather than the dysfunctionality of the WCB system shows that this orchestrated social manipulation campaign is working. </p>
<p>WCBs in Canada and the US represent employers (the only ones paying into the fund). Therefore WCBs will do whatever they can to lower fees for corporations. One way is by denying compensation payments to disabled workers. But this would be socially unacceptable unless the public can also be manipulated into believing that the worker is somehow negligent or at fault for causing the accident. In this social marketing campaign, WCBs are subtly adopting the language of  the anti-drunk-driver campaign  &#8211; &#8221; zero tolerance&#8221; &#8220;negligence&#8221;, etc. to manipulate public attitudes towards injured workers. They also use the term &#8220;accidents&#8221; rather than &#8220;injuries&#8221; to take the focus away from the person and onto the event. These ads, and other orchestrated &#8216;social engineering&#8217; techniques lay the foundation for WCBs to justify a reduction in injury compensation payments to disabled workers by manipulating public attitudes toward disabled workers.</p>
<p>Those injured workers in the videos would realistically spend the rest of their lives in poverty fighting the WCB for compensation.  </p>
<p>The way to reduce injuries is to make companies accountable for workplace safety violations through realistic fees, not protect unsafe companies from these higher fees by denying disabled workers&#8217; claims. </p>
<p>If you think the WSIB&#8217;s ads are scary, check out the Canadian Injured Workers Society at <a href="http://www.ciws.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.ciws.ca</a> for a real eye-opener!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

